Herpetological Monographs

218 papers and 8.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 218 papers published in Herpetological Monographs in the last decades have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Herpetological Monographs usually cover Global and Planetary Change (178 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (87 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (85 papers) specifically the topics of Amphibian and Reptile Biology (178 papers), Turtle Biology and Conservation (56 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Herpetological Monographs are David G. Chapple, Ronald Altig, David C. Cannatella, Daniel G. Blackburn, Linda Ford, Jeffrey E. Lovich, John J. Wiens, J. Whitfield Gibbons, Maureen Kearney and Steven Poe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Herpetological Monographs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Herpetological Monographs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Herpetological Monographs.

Countries where authors publish in Herpetological Monographs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Herpetological Monographs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Herpetological Monographs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herpetological Monographs more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025