Countries where authors publish in Molecular Imaging
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Imaging more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Imaging.
About Molecular Imaging
The 824 papers published in Molecular Imaging in the last decades have received a total of 23.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Molecular Imaging usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (298 papers), Biophysics (71 papers), Immunology and Allergy (33 papers), Cancer Research (70 papers) and Biotechnology (41 papers) specifically the topics of Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (134 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (81 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (74 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (70 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (65 papers), bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (57 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (55 papers) and Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (44 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Imaging are Sanjiv Sam Gambhir, John V. Frangioni, Andreas Markus Loening, Hak Soo Choi, Ralph Weissleder, Paul A. Dayton, Sylvain Gioux, Hisataka Kobayashi, Lee Josephson and Peter Choyke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.