Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

2.7k papers and 49.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Current Opinion in Gastroenterology in the last decades have received a total of 49.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Opinion in Gastroenterology usually cover Surgery (1.4k papers), Epidemiology (659 papers) and Gastroenterology (547 papers) specifically the topics of Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (383 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (323 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (298 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Opinion in Gastroenterology are Ruth E. Ley, Vincent B. Young, Mitchell L. Schubert, Andrew B. Shreiner, John Y. Kao, Lars Eckmann, Don C. Rockey, Eamonn M.M. Quigley, David Grundy and Michael Schemann.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Opinion in Gastroenterology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Opinion in Gastroenterology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025