Hand surgery & rehabilitation

878 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 878 papers published in Hand surgery & rehabilitation in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Hand surgery & rehabilitation usually cover Surgery (765 papers), Rehabilitation (310 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (177 papers) specifically the topics of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (637 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (294 papers) and Peripheral Nerve Disorders (167 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Hand surgery & rehabilitation are P. Bellemère, Philippe Liverneaux, Lionel Athlani, G. Dautel, P. Ledoux, Laurent Obert, François Loisel, Sybille Facca, J. Laulan and I. Pluvy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Hand surgery & rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Hand surgery & rehabilitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Hand surgery & rehabilitation.

Countries where authors publish in Hand surgery & rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Hand surgery & rehabilitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Hand surgery & rehabilitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hand surgery & rehabilitation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025