Novos Estudos - CEBRAP

526 papers and 2.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 526 papers published in Novos Estudos - CEBRAP in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Novos Estudos - CEBRAP usually cover Sociology and Political Science (249 papers), Urban Studies (94 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (79 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Political Issues (75 papers), Social and Economic Solidarity (63 papers) and Urban Development and Societal Issues (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Novos Estudos - CEBRAP are André Singer, Boaventura de Sousa Santos, Fernando Limongi, Ronaldo de Almeida, Paula Montero, Danièle Kergoat, Angela Alonso, Antônio Sérgio Alfredo Guimarães, Renata Bichir and Antônio Flávio de Oliveira Pierucci.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Novos Estudos - CEBRAP

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Novos Estudos - CEBRAP. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Novos Estudos - CEBRAP.

Countries where authors publish in Novos Estudos - CEBRAP

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Novos Estudos - CEBRAP. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Novos Estudos - CEBRAP with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Novos Estudos - CEBRAP more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025