Recreational Sports Journal

599 papers and 2.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 599 papers published in Recreational Sports Journal in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Recreational Sports Journal usually cover Social Psychology (256 papers), Sociology and Political Science (158 papers) and Gender Studies (124 papers) specifically the topics of Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (188 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (119 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (118 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Recreational Sports Journal are Scott Forrester, John J. Miller, Craig M. Ross, Michael A. Kanters, Daniel Elkins, Austin Anderson, David A. Hall, Brent A. Beggs, Robert J. Barcelona and Sarah Young.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Recreational Sports Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Recreational Sports Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Recreational Sports Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Recreational Sports Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Recreational Sports Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Recreational Sports Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Recreational Sports Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025