This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Group. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Group with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Group more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Group. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Group.
About Group
The 637 papers published in Group in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Group usually cover General Psychology (43 papers), Clinical Psychology (512 papers), Social Psychology (187 papers), Applied Psychology (26 papers) and Conservation (10 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (427 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (214 papers), Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (93 papers), Child Therapy and Development (73 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (53 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (51 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (46 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Group are Earl Hopper, K. Roy MacKenzie, Yvonne M. Agazarian, Rebecca MacNair-Semands, Anne Alonso, Malcolm Pines, Fred Wright, Nick Kanas, David A. Wollman and Debra L. Franko.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.