This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Haemostasis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Haemostasis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haemostasis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Haemostasis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Haemostasis.
About Haemostasis
The 1.2k papers published in Haemostasis in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Haemostasis usually cover Internal Medicine (246 papers), Hematology (559 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (343 papers), Genetics (139 papers) and Cancer Research (106 papers) specifically the topics of Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (314 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (246 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (214 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (187 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (172 papers), Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (163 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (159 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Haemostasis are Barry Halliwell, Maria Benedetta Donati, Armand Frydman, Gwendolyn J. Stewart, Robert B. Francis, Per Morten Sandset, Peter V. Hauschka, H.C. Hemker, William S. Fields and Ulrich Abildgaard.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.