Glasgow Mathematical Journal

2.0k papers and 13.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Glasgow Mathematical Journal in the last decades have received a total of 13.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Glasgow Mathematical Journal usually cover Geometry and Topology (962 papers), Algebra and Number Theory (820 papers) and Mathematical Physics (783 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Topics in Algebra (462 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (330 papers) and Rings, Modules, and Algebras (298 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Glasgow Mathematical Journal are J. J. Koliha, Bang‐Yen Chen, Matej Brešar, Thierry Levasseur, J. A. Erdös, Frank Nijhoff, Coy L. May, John Bibby, Stevo Stević and Mostafa Mbekhta.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Glasgow Mathematical Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Glasgow Mathematical Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Glasgow Mathematical Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Glasgow Mathematical Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Glasgow Mathematical Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Glasgow Mathematical Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glasgow Mathematical Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025