Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society · 1×
×1.17k/6kPALEO
×1.46k/5kGEOPH
×0.95k/6kAS
×0.61k/2kGEOLO
×1.21k/1kGP
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in GFF
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in GFF. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in GFF with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites GFF more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in GFF. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in GFF.
About GFF
The 1.1k papers published in GFF in the last decades have received a total of 14.6k indexed citations . Papers published in GFF usually cover Paleontology (487 papers), Geophysics (404 papers), Geology (154 papers), Atmospheric Science (401 papers) and Earth-Surface Processes (137 papers) specifically the topics of Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (430 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (397 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (342 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (197 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (172 papers), Geological formations and processes (130 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (110 papers) and Geological Studies and Exploration (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in GFF are Mikael Calner, Stig M. Bergström, Mats E. Eriksson, Karl‐Inge Åhäll, Anita Löfgren, John S. Peel, Markes E. Johnson, Trond Helge Torsvik, Per Ahlberg and Ulf Söderlund.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.