Countries where authors publish in Geoscience Canada
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geoscience Canada. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geoscience Canada with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoscience Canada more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Geoscience Canada. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geoscience Canada.
About Geoscience Canada
The 836 papers published in Geoscience Canada in the last decades have received a total of 20k indexed citations . Papers published in Geoscience Canada usually cover Geology (239 papers), Geophysics (288 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (128 papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (83 papers) and Paleontology (87 papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (248 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (176 papers), Geological formations and processes (104 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (89 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (75 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (58 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (41 papers) and Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (38 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geoscience Canada are Peter Albertus Hacquebard, N. Rast, A. J. Bowen, Grant D. Mossop, Hugh E. Hendry, Jenny Mackay, Lawrence D. Meinert, Petr Černý, Paul R. Schluger and A. E. Oldershaw.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.