Gestión y Política Pública

342 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 342 papers published in Gestión y Política Pública in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Gestión y Política Pública usually cover Political Science and International Relations (152 papers), Economics and Econometrics (69 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (67 papers) specifically the topics of Public Policy and Governance (94 papers), Social Sciences and Policies (38 papers) and Regional Development and Innovation (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Gestión y Política Pública are David Arellano Gault, Carlos Vilalta, Verónica Vázquez García, Mauricio Morales, Ismael Blanco, Pan Suk Kim, Joan Subirats, B. Guy Peters, Guillermo M. Cejudo and Eduardo Rodríguez-Oreggia.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Gestión y Política Pública

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Gestión y Política Pública. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Gestión y Política Pública.

Countries where authors publish in Gestión y Política Pública

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Gestión y Política Pública. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Gestión y Política Pública with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gestión y Política Pública more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025