This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Gender Issues. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Gender Issues with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gender Issues more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Gender Issues. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Gender Issues.
About Gender Issues
The 575 papers published in Gender Issues in the last decades have received a total of 7.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Gender Issues usually cover Gender Studies (261 papers), Sociology and Political Science (243 papers), Archeology (4 papers), Demography (41 papers) and Health (24 papers) specifically the topics of Gender Roles and Identity Studies (80 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (78 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (55 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (47 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (40 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (25 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (24 papers) and Gender, Security, and Conflict (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Gender Issues are Jo Doezema, Monique Wittig, Judith Kleinfeld, Rita J. Simon, Ming Tsui, Elizabeth Monk‐Turner, Christine Delphy, Robert L. Peralta, Kirsten Dellinger and J. Jill Suitor.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.