Gayana. Botánica

577 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 577 papers published in Gayana. Botánica in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Gayana. Botánica usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (356 papers), Plant Science (275 papers) and Food Science (78 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (194 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (128 papers) and Plant Diversity and Evolution (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Gayana. Botánica are Clodomiro Marticorena, M. Quezada, Carlos M. Baeza, Rosa Rubio, Fernando Borie, Lohengrin A. Cavieres, Alicia Marticorena, Aníbal Pauchard, Eduardo Ruíz and Christian Körner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Gayana. Botánica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Gayana. Botánica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Gayana. Botánica.

Countries where authors publish in Gayana. Botánica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Gayana. Botánica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Gayana. Botánica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gayana. Botánica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025