Functional & Integrative Genomics

1.5k papers and 33.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Functional & Integrative Genomics in the last decades have received a total of 33.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Functional & Integrative Genomics usually cover Molecular Biology (888 papers), Plant Science (700 papers) and Cancer Research (264 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Molecular Biology Research (193 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (154 papers) and Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (147 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Functional & Integrative Genomics are Hikmet Budak, Akhilesh K. Tyagi, Bikram S. Gill, Margaret Werner‐Washburne, Audrey P. Gasch, Baohong Zhang, Bala Anı Akpınar, Jitendra P. Khurana, P. K. Gupta and Mukesh Jain.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Functional & Integrative Genomics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Functional & Integrative Genomics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Functional & Integrative Genomics.

Countries where authors publish in Functional & Integrative Genomics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Functional & Integrative Genomics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Functional & Integrative Genomics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Functional & Integrative Genomics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025