Frontiers in Neural Circuits

1.5k papers and 39.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits in the last decades have received a total of 39.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (935 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (904 papers) and Molecular Biology (291 papers) specifically the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (631 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (547 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (219 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Neural Circuits are Ja‐Hyun Baik, Zhengmei Mao, Volodymyr Nikolenko, Wen‐Jun Gao, Benjamin A. Suter, Óscar Herreras, Garrett T. Neske, Egidio D’Angelo, Brielle R. Ferguson and Élodie Fino.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Neural Circuits

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Neural Circuits more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025