Countries where authors publish in Facial Plastic Surgery
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Facial Plastic Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Facial Plastic Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Facial Plastic Surgery more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Facial Plastic Surgery
This network shows the impact of papers published in Facial Plastic Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Facial Plastic Surgery.
About Facial Plastic Surgery
The 2.2k papers published in Facial Plastic Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 26.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Facial Plastic Surgery usually cover Dermatology (753 papers), Surgery (1.2k papers), Neurology (101 papers), Orthodontics (44 papers) and Urology (46 papers) specifically the topics of Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (686 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (634 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (361 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (138 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (131 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (88 papers), Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (76 papers) and Cleft Lip and Palate Research (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Facial Plastic Surgery are Anthony P. Sclafani, Thomas Romo, M. Eugene Tardy, James C. Alex, Dean M. Toriumi, David A. Sherris, Peter A. Adamson, Fred G. Fedok, Wolfgang Gubisch and Jonathan M. Sykes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.