Family practice management

230 papers and 703 indexed citations i.

About

The 230 papers published in Family practice management in the last decades have received a total of 703 indexed citations. Papers published in Family practice management usually cover General Health Professions (64 papers), Health Information Management (27 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (23 papers) specifically the topics of Primary Care and Health Outcomes (32 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (20 papers) and Accuracy of Clinical Coding in Healthcare Data (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Family practice management are John-Henry Pfifferling, David Marsland, Nicole A. Steckler, J. A. HARDMAN, Sarina Schrager, David C. Kibbe, Barbara Johnson, Susan Snyder, Steve North and Mitchell L. Cohen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Family practice management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Family practice management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Family practice management.

Countries where authors publish in Family practice management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Family practice management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Family practice management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Family practice management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025