Folia Linguistica Historica

304 papers and 1.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 304 papers published in Folia Linguistica Historica in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Folia Linguistica Historica usually cover Language and Linguistics (193 papers), Linguistics and Language (87 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (37 papers) specifically the topics of Linguistic Variation and Morphology (79 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (79 papers) and Lexicography and Language Studies (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Folia Linguistica Historica are T. Givón, Martín Haspelmath, Teresa Fanego, Peter Trudgill, Donka Minkova, Belén Méndez-Naya, Roger Lass, Olga Fischer, Suzanne Romaine and Frederik Kortlandt.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Folia Linguistica Historica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Folia Linguistica Historica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Folia Linguistica Historica.

Countries where authors publish in Folia Linguistica Historica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Folia Linguistica Historica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Folia Linguistica Historica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Folia Linguistica Historica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025