This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Instruments. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Instruments with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Instruments more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Instruments. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Instruments.
About Instruments
The 306 papers published in Instruments in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Instruments usually cover Radiation (106 papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (117 papers), Instrumentation (8 papers), Aerospace Engineering (51 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (41 papers) specifically the topics of Particle Detector Development and Performance (75 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (66 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (38 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (33 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (32 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (28 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (22 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Instruments are M. Marchevsky, Carmine Senatore, L. Rossi, Tengming Shen, Laura Garcia Fajardo, A. Buzulutskov, Francisco Alvès, Christos Riziotis, Joshua M. Pearce and M. Kandyla.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.