Countries where authors publish in Equine Veterinary Education
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Equine Veterinary Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Equine Veterinary Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Equine Veterinary Education more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Equine Veterinary Education
This network shows the impact of papers published in Equine Veterinary Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Equine Veterinary Education.
About Equine Veterinary Education
The 3.3k papers published in Equine Veterinary Education in the last decades have received a total of 21.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Equine Veterinary Education usually cover Equine (1.7k papers), Small Animals (1.0k papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (387 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (274 papers) and Endocrinology (139 papers) specifically the topics of Veterinary Equine Medical Research (1.7k papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (316 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (260 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (233 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (223 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (223 papers), Animal health and immunology (186 papers) and Helminth infection and control (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Equine Veterinary Education are Sue Dyson, Tim Mair, Martin K. Nielsen, W. H. Tremaine, Nicola Robinson, P. M. Dixon, P. M. DIXON, T. S. Mair, S. E. O’Grady and T. E. Walton.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.