Equity & Excellence in Education

1.5k papers and 19.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Equity & Excellence in Education in the last decades have received a total of 19.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Equity & Excellence in Education usually cover Education (905 papers), Sociology and Political Science (561 papers) and Social Psychology (94 papers) specifically the topics of Critical Race Theory in Education (349 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (194 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (156 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Equity & Excellence in Education are James S. Coleman, Tara J. Yosso, Dolores Delgado Bernal, Gloria Ladson‐Billings, Heather W. Hackman, Octavio Villalpando, Barbara J. Love, Jasmin Zine, Paul C. Gorski and Julio Cammarota.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Equity & Excellence in Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Equity & Excellence in Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Equity & Excellence in Education.

Countries where authors publish in Equity & Excellence in Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Equity & Excellence in Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Equity & Excellence in Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Equity & Excellence in Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025