Journal of Conservative Dentistry

1.5k papers and 20.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Journal of Conservative Dentistry in the last decades have received a total of 20.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Conservative Dentistry usually cover Oral Surgery (1.2k papers), Orthodontics (798 papers) and General Dentistry (169 papers) specifically the topics of Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments (883 papers), Dental materials and restorations (732 papers) and Dental Radiography and Imaging (568 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Conservative Dentistry are Deivanayagam Kandaswamy, Jogikalmat Krithikadatta, Velayutham Gopikrishna, Arvind Shenoy, Saeed Asgary, Mithra N. Hegde, LLakshmi Narayanan, Vivek Aggarwal, Sanjay Miglani and M Kundabala.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Conservative Dentistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Conservative Dentistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Conservative Dentistry.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Conservative Dentistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Conservative Dentistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Conservative Dentistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Conservative Dentistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025