Epistemology & Philosophy of Science

431 papers and 627 indexed citations i.

About

The 431 papers published in Epistemology & Philosophy of Science in the last decades have received a total of 627 indexed citations. Papers published in Epistemology & Philosophy of Science usually cover Philosophy (43 papers), Information Systems (42 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (39 papers) specifically the topics of Scientific Research and Philosophical Inquiry (29 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (27 papers) and Educational Innovations and Challenges (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Epistemology & Philosophy of Science are William Whewell, Benjamin Lee Whorf, Joshua Knobe, John Dupré, Gastón Bachelard, Nico Stehr, Steve Fuller, Inanna Hamati‐Ataya, John Greco and Yuri Balashov.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Epistemology & Philosophy of Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Epistemology & Philosophy of Science.

Countries where authors publish in Epistemology & Philosophy of Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Epistemology & Philosophy of Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Epistemology & Philosophy of Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025