Environmental and Experimental Botany

237.4k citations
5.6k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Plant Science top 0.5%
    • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
    • Plant responses to elevated CO2
    • Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
    • Plant responses to water stress
    • Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
  • Pollution top 1%
    • Heavy metals in environment

Papers in

    • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance 2.1k
    • Plant responses to elevated CO2 817
    • Plant Molecular Biology Research 605
    • Plant responses to water stress 560
    • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 551
    • Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects 506
    • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 735

Environmental and Experimental Botany

5.5k papers receiving 225.9k citations

Peers

Environmental and Experimental Botany
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
  • Plant Science 180.8k
  • Pollution 22.7k
  • Soil Science 13.8k
  • Global and Planetary Change 23.2k
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 10.8k
Replace Journal of Plant Physiology with:
Journal of Plant Physiology Germany
Plant Science China
Trends in Plant Science United States
Physiologia Plantarum United States
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry China
Plants China
Planta Germany
Scientia Horticulturae China
Agronomy China
Frontiers in Plant Science China
Environmental and Experimental Botany relative to Journal of Plant Physiology Germany Journal of Plant Physiology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Journal of Plant Physiology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Environmental and Experimental Botany

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental and Experimental Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental and Experimental Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental and Experimental Botany more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Environmental and Experimental Botany

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental and Experimental Botany. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental and Experimental Botany.

About Environmental and Experimental Botany

The 5.6k papers published in Environmental and Experimental Botany in the last decades have received a total of 237.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Environmental and Experimental Botany usually cover Plant Science (4.7k papers), Global and Planetary Change (828 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (647 papers), Pollution (383 papers) and Soil Science (267 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (2.1k papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (817 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (735 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (622 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (605 papers), Plant responses to water stress (560 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (551 papers) and Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects (506 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental and Experimental Botany are Muhammad Ashraf, Majid R. Foolad, R. Gabbrielli, İsmail Türkan, Luigi Sanità di Toppi, Abdul Wahid, Vadim V. Demidchik, Christine Helen Foyer, Tijen Demiral and S. R. Pezeshki.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact