BMC Emergency Medicine

1.3k papers and 13.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in BMC Emergency Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 13.6k indexed citations. Papers published in BMC Emergency Medicine usually cover Emergency Medicine (845 papers), Epidemiology (214 papers) and Surgery (208 papers) specifically the topics of Emergency and Acute Care Studies (507 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (383 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (246 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMC Emergency Medicine are Christian J. Wiedermann, Junaid Razzak, Ulf Ekelund, Nicholas Sowers, Peter Hallas, Trond E. Ellingsen, Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh, Adnan A. Hyder, Pablo Perel and Ian Roberts.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMC Emergency Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMC Emergency Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMC Emergency Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in BMC Emergency Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMC Emergency Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMC Emergency Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMC Emergency Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025