Countries where authors publish in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Korean Journal of Ophthalmology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology.
About Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
The 1.6k papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 17.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology usually cover Ophthalmology (1.2k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (767 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (214 papers), Neurology (157 papers) and Dermatology (90 papers) specifically the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (570 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (421 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (339 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (299 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (196 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (186 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (180 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (175 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology are Man Soo Kim, Won Ryang Wee, Mee Kum Kim, Jin Hak Lee, Kyung Chul Yoon, Yang Kyeung Cho, Young Suk Yu, Se Joon Woo, Shwu‐Jiuan Sheu and Jin Sook Yoon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.