Countries where authors publish in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Korean Journal of Ophthalmology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology.
About Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
The 1.6k papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 18.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology usually cover Ophthalmology (751 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (395 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (161 papers), Dermatology (58 papers) and Neurology (87 papers) specifically the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (278 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (230 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (166 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (152 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (138 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (135 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (110 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (100 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Korean Journal of Ophthalmology are Man Soo Kim, Won Ryang Wee, Mee Kum Kim, Jin Hak Lee, Kyung Chul Yoon, Yang Kyeung Cho, Young Suk Yu, Se Joon Woo, Hyeong Gon Yu and Shwu‐Jiuan Sheu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.