New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics · 1×
×1.655k/35kGEOPH
×1.214k/11kPALEO
×1.011k/10kEP
×0.720k/28kAS
×1.56k/4kGP
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Terra Nova
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Terra Nova. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Terra Nova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Terra Nova more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Terra Nova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Terra Nova.
About Terra Nova
The 2.2k papers published in Terra Nova in the last decades have received a total of 84.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Terra Nova usually cover Geophysics (1.6k papers), Paleontology (355 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (328 papers), Atmospheric Science (652 papers) and Geology (178 papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1.3k papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (1.1k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (639 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (541 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (321 papers), Geological formations and processes (294 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide (267 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (211 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Terra Nova are Noel Cressie, Carlo Doglioni, Ph. Matte, Paul F. Hoffman, Daniel P. Schrag, J. P. Platt, Igor M. Villa, J.M. McArthur, Graham Shields and Martin Ekman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.