IFLA Journal

1.3k papers and 6.3k indexed citations

About

The 1.3k papers published in IFLA Journal in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations. Papers published in IFLA Journal usually cover Information Systems (392 papers), Library and Information Sciences (327 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (121 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Administration (218 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (215 papers) and Digital and Traditional Archives Management (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in IFLA Journal are Martin Nakata, Michael E. D. Koenig, Maurice Β. Line, Tibor Koltay, Chaka Chaka, Md. Anwarul Islam, Marc Kosciejew, Stephen C. Parker, Anup Kumar Das and Jabulani Sithole.

In The Last Decade

IFLA Journal

792 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Fields of papers published in IFLA Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in IFLA Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IFLA Journal.

Countries where authors publish in IFLA Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IFLA Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IFLA Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IFLA Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026