Digital Library Perspectives

1.6k citations
279 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Digital Library Perspectives

235 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Digital Library Perspectives
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Library and Information Sciences 276
  • Information Systems and Management 316
  • Conservation 117
  • Information Systems 686
  • Health Informatics 37
Replace LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries with:
LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries United Kingdom
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association Australia
African Journal of Library Archives and Information Science Nigeria
Journal of Web Librarianship United States
New Review of Information Networking United Kingdom
Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries United States
Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian United States
Journal of Electronic Publishing United States
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science Malaysia
Information and Learning Sciences United States
Digital Library Perspectives relative to LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries United Kingdom LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Digital Library Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Digital Library Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Digital Library Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digital Library Perspectives more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Digital Library Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Digital Library Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Digital Library Perspectives.

About Digital Library Perspectives

The 279 papers published in Digital Library Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Digital Library Perspectives usually cover Library and Information Sciences (48 papers), Conservation (49 papers), Information Systems and Management (58 papers), Information Systems (148 papers) and Communication (40 papers) specifically the topics of Research Data Management Practices (52 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (48 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (38 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (35 papers), Web and Library Services (32 papers), Library Science and Administration (27 papers), Data Quality and Management (25 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Digital Library Perspectives are H. Frank Cervone, Essam Mansour, Asad Khan, S.M. Zabed Ahmed, Ali Shiri, Md. Anwarul Islam, Robert Fox, Shamshad Ahmed, Sulistyo Basuki and Soohyung Joo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact