Journal of Web Librarianship

3.1k citations
391 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy
    • Library Science and Administration
    • Web and Library Services
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
    • Research Data Management Practices

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 86
    • Web and Library Services 148
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 68
    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior 26
    • Digital Rights Management and Security 21

Journal of Web Librarianship

313 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Journal of Web Librarianship
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Library and Information Sciences 745
  • Information Systems 1.8k
  • Communication 394
  • Computer Science Applications 277
  • Information Systems and Management 330
Replace Internet Reference Services Quarterly with:
Internet Reference Services Quarterly United States
Information Technology and Libraries United States
Computers in libraries United States
New Review of Academic Librarianship United Kingdom
College & Undergraduate Libraries United States
Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship United States
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association Australia
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science Malaysia
LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries United Kingdom
Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology United States
Journal of Web Librarianship relative to Internet Reference Services Quarterly United States Internet Reference Services Quarterly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Internet Reference Services Quarterly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Web Librarianship

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Web Librarianship. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Web Librarianship more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship.

About Journal of Web Librarianship

The 391 papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Web Librarianship usually cover Library and Information Sciences (93 papers), Information Systems (255 papers), Human Factors and Ergonomics (15 papers), Communication (41 papers) and Computer Science Applications (32 papers) specifically the topics of Web and Library Services (148 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (86 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (68 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (26 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (26 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (23 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (21 papers) and Digital Rights Management and Security (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Web Librarianship are Bradford Lee Eden, Noa Aharony, Barbara Blummer, Jody Condit Fagan, Melissa Adler, Sarah Anne Murphy, Sarah Williams, Brian Mathews, Lisa C. Thomas and Anabel Quan‐Haase.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact