New Review of Information Networking

246 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 246 papers published in New Review of Information Networking in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in New Review of Information Networking usually cover Information Systems (112 papers), Conservation (40 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (28 papers) specifically the topics of Digital and Traditional Archives Management (39 papers), Web and Library Services (33 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Review of Information Networking are Seamus Ross, Mark Ware, Shadrack Katuu, Kim H. Veltman, M. Rajasekhara Babu, Praveen Kumar Reddy Maddikunta, Stevan Harnad, Reza Fotohi, Shahram Jamali and Carol Hansen Montgomery.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in New Review of Information Networking

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Review of Information Networking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Review of Information Networking.

Countries where authors publish in New Review of Information Networking

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Review of Information Networking. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Review of Information Networking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Review of Information Networking more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025