Digital Investigation

791 papers and 14.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 791 papers published in Digital Investigation in the last decades have received a total of 14.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Digital Investigation usually cover Information Systems (610 papers), Signal Processing (450 papers) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (257 papers) specifically the topics of Digital and Cyber Forensics (547 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (434 papers) and Digital Media Forensic Detection (219 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Digital Investigation are Simson Garfinkel, Eoghan Casey, Kim‐Kwang Raymond Choo, Jesse D. Kornblum, Vassil Roussev, Mourad Debbabi, Graeme Horsman, Ibrahim Baggili, Michael Cohen and Golden G. Richard.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Digital Investigation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Digital Investigation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Digital Investigation.

Countries where authors publish in Digital Investigation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Digital Investigation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Digital Investigation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digital Investigation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025