The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review
272 papers
receiving
822 citations
Peers
The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
Gender Studies210
Public Administration56
Communication101
Sociology and Political Science559
Education330
Replace The Journal of Speculative Philosophy with:
The Journal of Speculative PhilosophyUnited States
Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskningNorway
Sociologisk ForskningSweden
Soziale WeltGermany
Global DiscourseUnited Kingdom
Irish Journal of SociologyIreland
Culture Unbound Journal of Current Cultural ResearchSweden
Revista Española de SociologíaSpain
Política y SociedadSpain
Empiria Revista de metodología de ciencias socialesSpain
The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Reviewrelative toThe Journal of Speculative PhilosophyUnited StatesThe Journal of Speculative Philosophy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
The Journal of Speculative Philosophy · 1×
×1.0210/221GS
×1.256/47PA
×1.1101/95COMMU
×0.4559/1kSPS
×1.0330/323EDUCA
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review.
About The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review
The 475 papers published in The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Papers published in The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review usually cover Gender Studies (45 papers), Public Administration (15 papers), Education (96 papers), Sociology and Political Science (122 papers) and Communication (17 papers) specifically the topics of Gender Diversity and Inequality (29 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (23 papers), Education Systems and Policy (22 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (18 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (12 papers), International Student and Expatriate Challenges (11 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (11 papers) and Migration, Refugees, and Integration (10 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations Communities and Nations Annual Review are David Throsby, Lisa Goodson, Jenny Phillimore, Affrica Taylor, John Miller, Marc Bendick, Lena Robinson, Eman Gaad, Denise Wood and Kasim Randeree.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.