EFORT Open Reviews

280 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 280 papers published in EFORT Open Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in EFORT Open Reviews usually cover Surgery (223 papers), Epidemiology (63 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (47 papers) specifically the topics of Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (73 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (66 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in EFORT Open Reviews are E. Carlos Rodríguez‐Merchán, Fabian Krause, Helen Anwander, Marjan Wouthuyzen‐Bakker, Pietro Ruggieri, Mario Herrera‐Pérez, David González‐Martín, Andrea Angelini, Heiner Fangerau and Peter V. Giannoudis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in EFORT Open Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in EFORT Open Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in EFORT Open Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in EFORT Open Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in EFORT Open Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in EFORT Open Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites EFORT Open Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025