Countries where authors publish in Digestive Surgery
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Digestive Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Digestive Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digestive Surgery more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Digestive Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Digestive Surgery.
About Digestive Surgery
The 2.4k papers published in Digestive Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 43.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Digestive Surgery usually cover Gastroenterology (180 papers), Hepatology (220 papers), Surgery (1.1k papers), Oncology (522 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (490 papers) specifically the topics of Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (279 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (177 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (172 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (166 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (165 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (164 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (110 papers) and Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Digestive Surgery are Claude Couinaud, Markus Wolfgang Büchler, Thomas M. van Gulik, Johan Frederik Lange, Christos Dervenis, Markus Wolfgang Büchler, Dirk Joan Gouma, John P. Neoptolemos, Helmut Friess and Theodore Liakakos.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.