This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ocean Dynamics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ocean Dynamics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ocean Dynamics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Ocean Dynamics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ocean Dynamics.
About Ocean Dynamics
The 2.5k papers published in Ocean Dynamics in the last decades have received a total of 49.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Ocean Dynamics usually cover Oceanography (1.8k papers), Earth-Surface Processes (633 papers), Atmospheric Science (1.0k papers), Global and Planetary Change (648 papers) and Environmental Chemistry (132 papers) specifically the topics of Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (1.4k papers), Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (735 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (553 papers), Coastal and Marine Dynamics (500 papers), Climate variability and models (490 papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (346 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (204 papers) and Geological formations and processes (196 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ocean Dynamics are Geir Evensen, Jan Backhaus, Johan C. Winterwerp, Thierry Letellier, Olivier Francis, Fabien Lefèvre, Florent Lyard, Ralf Weiße, Tal Ezer and W. Paul Budgell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.