Déviance et Société

902 papers and 3.8k indexed citations

About

The 902 papers published in Déviance et Société in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Déviance et Société usually cover Sociology and Political Science (602 papers), General Health Professions (284 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (163 papers) specifically the topics of Education, sociology, and vocational training (270 papers), Historical and Scientific Studies (163 papers) and Health, Medicine and Society (129 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Déviance et Société are Gilles Chantraine, Laurent Mucchielli, Coline Cardi, Philippe Robert, Antoinette Chauvenet, Renée Zauberman, Laurence Simmat-Durand, Anne Barrère, Didier Lapeyronnie and Jean‐Paul Brodeur.

In The Last Decade

Déviance et Société

661 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Fields of papers published in Déviance et Société

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Déviance et Société. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Déviance et Société.

Countries where authors publish in Déviance et Société

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Déviance et Société. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Déviance et Société with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Déviance et Société more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026