Current Sleep Medicine Reports

259 papers and 3.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 259 papers published in Current Sleep Medicine Reports in the last decades have received a total of 3.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Sleep Medicine Reports usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (154 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (150 papers) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (120 papers) specifically the topics of Sleep and related disorders (148 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (146 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Sleep Medicine Reports are Timo Partonen, Hans P. A. Van Dongen, Kimberly A. Honn, Stephen James, Shobhan Gaddameedhi, Michael K. Scullin, Liia Kivelä, Niki Antypa, Mariana G. Figueiro and Vsevolod Y. Polotsky.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Sleep Medicine Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Sleep Medicine Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Sleep Medicine Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Current Sleep Medicine Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Sleep Medicine Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Sleep Medicine Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Sleep Medicine Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025