Current Protocols in Toxicology

387 papers and 5.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 387 papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology usually cover Molecular Biology (179 papers), Biochemistry (37 papers) and Immunology (34 papers) specifically the topics of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (26 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (26 papers) and Sulfur Compounds in Biology (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Protocols in Toxicology are Michael Aschner, Bengt Mannervik, Leslie B. Poole, Lucio G. Costa, Arne Holmgren, Elias S.J. Arnér, Yvonne Will, Paul Honegger, Kimberly Nelson and L. Turco.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Protocols in Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Protocols in Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Protocols in Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Protocols in Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025