Cultura de los Cuidados

587 papers and 900 indexed citations i.

About

The 587 papers published in Cultura de los Cuidados in the last decades have received a total of 900 indexed citations. Papers published in Cultura de los Cuidados usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (185 papers), General Health Professions (152 papers) and Pharmacy (118 papers) specifically the topics of Nursing care and research (117 papers), Aging, Health, and Disability (75 papers) and Palliative and Oncologic Care (64 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cultura de los Cuidados are José Siles González, Carmen de la Cuesta Benjumea, M. Carmen Solano Ruiz, Rachel E. Spector, Madeleine Leininger, Genival Fernandes de Freitas, Callista Roy, Paulo Joaquím Pina Queirós, Larry D. Purnell and José Luis Díaz Agea.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cultura de los Cuidados

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cultura de los Cuidados. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cultura de los Cuidados.

Countries where authors publish in Cultura de los Cuidados

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cultura de los Cuidados. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cultura de los Cuidados with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cultura de los Cuidados more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025