Irish Theological Quarterly

694 papers and 836 indexed citations

About

The 694 papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 836 indexed citations. Papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly usually cover Religious studies (259 papers), Sociology and Political Science (189 papers) and History (162 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (143 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (76 papers) and Catholicism and Religious Studies (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Irish Theological Quarterly are Lieven Boeve, Martin McNamara, John A. O'Flynn, Michael Bertram Crowe, Sean M. Quinlan, Susan Docherty, Julia Kristeva, James McEvoy, Thomas D. Ryan and Amy‐Jill Levine.

In The Last Decade

Irish Theological Quarterly

260 papers receiving 451 citations

Fields of papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Irish Theological Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Irish Theological Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irish Theological Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026