Countries where authors publish in Irish Theological Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Irish Theological Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irish Theological Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly.
About Irish Theological Quarterly
The 696 papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Irish Theological Quarterly usually cover Religious studies (261 papers), History (170 papers), Philosophy (157 papers), Classics (51 papers) and Geography, Planning and Development (24 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (135 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (79 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (78 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (69 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (66 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (61 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (54 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Irish Theological Quarterly are Martin McNamara, Michael Bertram Crowe, Lieven Boeve, John A. O'Flynn, Susan E. Docherty, Sean M. Quinlan, Amy‐Jill Levine, James Gerard McEvoy, Brian Kelly and Julia Kristeva.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.