International Review of Mission

2.2k citations
1.1k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Christian Theology and Mission
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
    • Religion, Society, and Development
    • Religion and Society Interactions

Papers in

    • Christian Theology and Mission 767
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 505
    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 99
    • Theology and Canon Law Studies 19
    • Religion, Society, and Development 645
    • Religion and Society Interactions 30

International Review of Mission

513 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

International Review of Mission
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Religious studies 1.2k
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.6k
  • Health 130
  • Geography, Planning and Development 93
  • Anthropology 132
Replace International Bulletin of Missionary Research with:
International Bulletin of Missionary Research United States
The Ecumenical Review United States
Transformation An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies United Kingdom
Pneuma United States
The Expository Times United Kingdom
Biblical Theology Bulletin Journal of Bible and Culture United States
Interpretation A Journal of Bible and Theology United States
Theology Today United States
Journal for the Study of the Old Testament United States
Verbum et Ecclesia South Africa
International Review of Mission relative to International Bulletin of Missionary Research United States International Bulletin of Missionary Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
International Bulletin of Missionary Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Review of Mission

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Review of Mission. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Review of Mission with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Review of Mission more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Review of Mission

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Review of Mission. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Review of Mission.

About International Review of Mission

The 1.1k papers published in International Review of Mission in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations . Papers published in International Review of Mission usually cover Religious studies (827 papers), Sociology and Political Science (728 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (42 papers), General Social Sciences (8 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (46 papers) specifically the topics of Christian Theology and Mission (767 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (645 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (505 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (99 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (41 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (30 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (23 papers) and Theology and Canon Law Studies (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Review of Mission are John Mbiti, Grace Davie, Isabel Apawo Phiri, Stephen Bevans, Walter J. Hollenweger, David B. Barrett, J. Kwabena Asamoah‐Gyadu, Lamin Sanneh, James R. Cochrane and Chammah J. Kaunda.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact