Critical Ultrasound Journal

262 papers and 4.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 262 papers published in Critical Ultrasound Journal in the last decades have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Ultrasound Journal usually cover Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (162 papers), Surgery (119 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (81 papers) specifically the topics of Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (161 papers), Radiology practices and education (55 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Ultrasound Journal are Giovanni Volpicelli, James W. Tsung, Pablo Blanco, David Kessler, Vaishali Shah, Sachita Shah, Luca Macarini, Fabrizio Elia, Giovanna De Filippi and Franco Aprà.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Ultrasound Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Ultrasound Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Ultrasound Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Ultrasound Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Ultrasound Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Ultrasound Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Ultrasound Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025