Contemporary British History

3.9k citations
920 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Political and Economic history of UK and US
    • Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • History top 5%
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
    • Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics

Papers in

    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 81
    • Scottish History and National Identity 56
    • Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics 41
    • Political and Economic history of UK and US 265
    • World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact 59

Contemporary British History

615 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Contemporary British History
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.8k
  • History 795
  • Public Administration 142
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.7k
  • Finance 336
Replace Twentieth Century British History with:
Twentieth Century British History United Kingdom
Michigan Historical Review United States
Contemporary European History United Kingdom
Australian Historical Studies Australia
Dialectical Anthropology United States
Journal of Historical Sociology United States
Journal of Canadian Studies Canada
Australian Journal of Politics & History Australia
History and Anthropology United Kingdom
Journal of Policy History United States
Contemporary British History relative to Twentieth Century British History United Kingdom Twentieth Century British History's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Twentieth Century British History · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary British History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary British History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary British History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary British History more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Contemporary British History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary British History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary British History.

About Contemporary British History

The 920 papers published in Contemporary British History in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Contemporary British History usually cover History (222 papers), Political Science and International Relations (443 papers), Sociology and Political Science (369 papers), Music (19 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (22 papers) specifically the topics of Political and Economic history of UK and US (265 papers), Irish and British Studies (102 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (81 papers), Australian History and Society (64 papers), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (59 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (56 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (41 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary British History are Anthony King, Jim Tomlinson, Virginia S. Berridge, Mike Savage, Nick Clarke, Matthew Worley, Jim Phillips, Stefan Schwarzkopf, John Callaghan and John Sheail.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact