Computers in the Schools

948 papers and 7.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 948 papers published in Computers in the Schools in the last decades have received a total of 7.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Computers in the Schools usually cover Education (500 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (191 papers) and Information Systems (159 papers) specifically the topics of Online and Blended Learning (176 papers), Education and Technology Integration (160 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (142 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computers in the Schools are Cleborne D. Maddux, D. LaMont Johnson, Savilla Banister, Peter Albion, Douglas H. Clements, Mary Helen Fagan, Jerry Willis, Michael W. Apple, Leping Liu and W. Michael Reed.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Computers in the Schools

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computers in the Schools. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computers in the Schools.

Countries where authors publish in Computers in the Schools

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computers in the Schools. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computers in the Schools with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computers in the Schools more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025