Computers in libraries

2.5k citations
562 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy
    • Library Science and Administration
    • Web and Library Services
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 42
    • Library Science and Administration 23
    • Web and Library Services 111
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 83
    • Library Science and Information Systems 19

Computers in libraries

318 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Computers in libraries
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Library and Information Sciences 669
  • Information Systems 1.6k
  • Communication 332
  • Computer Science Applications 200
  • Information Systems and Management 221
Replace Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship with:
Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship United States
Public & Access Services Quarterly United States
Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian United States
Journal of Web Librarianship United States
Online United States
College & Undergraduate Libraries United States
Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science Malaysia
Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology United States
Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship United States
Journal of Information Literacy United Kingdom
Computers in libraries relative to Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship United States Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Computers in libraries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computers in libraries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computers in libraries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computers in libraries more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Computers in libraries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computers in libraries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computers in libraries.

About Computers in libraries

The 562 papers published in Computers in libraries in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Computers in libraries usually cover Library and Information Sciences (55 papers), Information Systems (238 papers), Conservation (26 papers), Computer Science Applications (20 papers) and Communication (18 papers) specifically the topics of Web and Library Services (111 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (83 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (42 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (26 papers), Library Science and Administration (23 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (19 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (19 papers) and Library Science and Information Systems (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computers in libraries are Marshall Breeding, H. Frank Cervone, Lisa Ennis, Eric Lease Morgan, Jody Condit Fagan, Barbara Wood, David Evans, William D. Milheim, Daniel Ferrer and Tom Peters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact