Countries where authors publish in Materials Science
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Materials Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Materials Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Materials Science more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Materials Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Materials Science.
About Materials Science
The 4.7k papers published in Materials Science in the last decades have received a total of 19.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Materials Science usually cover Metals and Alloys (919 papers), Mechanics of Materials (1.8k papers), Mechanical Engineering (1.7k papers), General Materials Science (118 papers) and Materials Chemistry (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Fatigue and fracture mechanics (1.1k papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (919 papers), Elasticity and Wave Propagation (443 papers), Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms (424 papers), Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (410 papers), Surface Treatment and Coatings (409 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (278 papers) and High Temperature Alloys and Creep (220 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Materials Science are H. М. Nykyforchyn, Mykhaylo P. Savruk, Olexandr Andreikiv, V. V. Panasyuk, Oleksandra Student, Orest P. Ostash, М. D. Klapkiv, S. Ya. Yarema, Olha Zvirko and O. N. Romaniv.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.