Countries where authors publish in Materials Science
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Materials Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Materials Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Materials Science more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Materials Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Materials Science.
About Materials Science
The 4.7k papers published in Materials Science in the last decades have received a total of 18.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Materials Science usually cover General Materials Science (1.1k papers), Metals and Alloys (445 papers), Mechanics of Materials (2.5k papers), Materials Chemistry (3.0k papers) and Mechanical Engineering (2.1k papers) specifically the topics of Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms (2.0k papers), Material Properties and Applications (1.1k papers), Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability (1.1k papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (508 papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (445 papers), Elasticity and Wave Propagation (374 papers), Metal Alloys Wear and Properties (323 papers) and Surface Treatment and Coatings (263 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Materials Science are H. М. Nykyforchyn, М. P. Savruk, А. Е. Андрейкив, V. V. Panasyuk, О. Z. Student, О. P. Ostash, М. D. Klapkiv, S. Ya. Yarema, Olha Zvirko and O. N. Romaniv.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.