Progress in Palliative Care

615 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 615 papers published in Progress in Palliative Care in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Progress in Palliative Care usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (404 papers), Clinical Psychology (166 papers) and General Health Professions (164 papers) specifically the topics of Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (394 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (135 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Palliative Care are J Łuczak, Jason Mills, Samar Aoun, Merryn Gott, John Rosenberg, Grace Johnston, Bruce Rumbold, Allan Kellehear, Ian Maddocks and Kerrie Noonan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Progress in Palliative Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Palliative Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Palliative Care.

Countries where authors publish in Progress in Palliative Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Palliative Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Palliative Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Palliative Care more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025