Clinical Laboratory

2.9k papers and 15.9k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Clinical Laboratory in the last decades have received a total of 15.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Laboratory usually cover Molecular Biology (702 papers), Epidemiology (611 papers) and Cancer Research (365 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (186 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (172 papers) and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis (129 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Laboratory are Raluca Dumache, Mustafa Erinç Sitar, Ufuk Çakatay, Seval Aydın, Alexandru Florin Rogobete, Yuan Dang, Qiaojia Huang, Mulugeta Melku, Soudabeh Fallah and Giuseppe Lippi.

In The Last Decade

Clinical Laboratory

2.6k papers receiving 15.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Clinical Laboratory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Laboratory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Laboratory.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Laboratory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Laboratory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Laboratory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Laboratory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026